Journal Article
The uplift of soil nutrients by plants: biogeochemical consequences across scales
Authors: Jobbágy EG, RB Jackson
Although the bulk of plant biomass contains relatively light, atmospherically derived elements (C, H, O, N, and S), 5 to 10% of biomass is comprised of heavier elements from soil minerals, such as Ca, Mg, K, and P. Plant uptake and cycling transport these heavier elements to the soil surface, resulting in shallower vertical distributions for strongly cycled elements than for other elements. In this paper we evaluate the biogeochemical consequences of this process at different spatial and temporal scales based on chronosequence studies and soil database analyses. In the bare coastal dunes of Argentina, the vertical distributions of exchangeable K+ (strongly cycled) and Na+ (more weakly cycled) were similar initially but diverged 15 years after pine afforestation, with K distributions becoming significantly concentrated in the surface and Na distributions becoming deeper (P<0.05). To evaluate the effects of plant stoichiometry on micronutrient distributions, chronosequences of paired native grasslands (low Mn cycling) and eucalypt plantations (high Mn cycling) in the Pampas of Argentina were also used. Within fifty years, Eucalypts dramatically redistributed Mn pools towards the soil surface, reducing total pools by half at medium depths (20 to 60 cm) and increasing concentrations by up to an order of magnitude at the surface. Globally, we used generalized contrasts among exchangeable K, Na, and Mg in 7661 soil profiles to estimate the global magnitude of K uplift due to plant activity. Based on this calculation, the exchangeable K pool in the top 20 cm of soils without plant uplift would be 4-6 Pg smaller globally, one-third to one-half smaller than its current size. Vegetation change alters the vertical distribution and bioavailability of mineral elements. Understanding how the stoichiometry of plant cycling affects soil nutrient distributions will help refine predictions of the biogeochemical consequences of current vegetation change.
ecology04b.pdf
Journal Name
Ecology
Publication Date
2004
DOI
doi:10.1890/03-0245